Federation News Archive - 2020

Federation Council Unanimously Approves Recommendations that Chart Path Towards Reconciliation

The Federation has adopted an overarching framework to guide it on the path to reconciliation with Indigenous peoples in Canada. Laid out in a report from the Federation's TRC Calls to Action Advisory Committee ("Advisory Committee"), the framework is rooted in the recognition of the significance of Indigenous legal orders, legal principles, and the perspectives and experiences of Indigenous peoples. The framework encourages a broad approach to reconciliation while specifically addressing two of the Calls to Action in the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s (TRC) Final Report, which highlighted the need to raise awareness and competence among all legal professionals and law students in Canada as it relates to Indigenous peoples. The nine recommendations in the Advisory Committee's report received the unanimous support of the Council of the Federation during its June meeting. The path to reconciliation envisioned by the Advisory Committee emphasizes enhancing knowledge, sharing information, encouraging ongoing dialogue and relationship building, and promoting reflection at individual and institutional levels. “This is a significant and very welcome step,” Federation President Morgan C. Cooper wrote in a note to law society presidents following the vote. “Much of the inspiration for these recommendations is directly attributable to the work that many of you have undertaken within your jurisdictions.” Two of the Advisory Committee’s recommendations directly address the Federation’s work as a national organization, recognizing its unique mandate and relationship with law societies and law schools. The first recommendation calls on the Federation to issue a statement that will include a series of principles to guide all aspects of the Federation’s work. The Advisory Committee also recommended that the Federation become the national information hub for law societies to share information and that it explore opportunities for building relationships with national Indigenous organizations. The second recommendation called on the Federation to pursue a collaborative relationship with the legal academy, rather than amending the National Requirement to respond to the TRC Calls to Action dealing with legal education. The remaining seven recommendations call on the Federation to urge law societies to take specific action to foster reconciliation, including: make a formal commitment to reconciliation and develop a framework for action; critically examine regulatory processes and structures to consider how they may be more inclusive of the needs and perspectives of Indigenous peoples, and how they may adversely impact them; provide ongoing opportunities for competency and awareness training for law society leadership and staff; continue building relationships…

Federation Supports Proposed National Beneficial Ownership Registry

The Federation of Law Societies of Canada supports the creation of a beneficial ownership registry for federally incorporated companies as an appropriate, necessary and welcome measure to combat money laundering, terrorist financing and other illicit activities. In a submission responding to the consultation paper issued by the Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development and the Department of Finance, the Federation says a critical issue will be access rules for the proposed registry, which must enhance efforts to fight money laundering and the financing of terrorism. The Federation submission says legal professionals and other reporting entities must be given access to the registry from the start “to ensure that they have an objective, reliable means of fulfilling their obligations to identify beneficial owners.” The Federation acknowledges there are competing public policy interests in determining access rules. Careful consideration must be given to how to balance the goal of greater corporate transparency with the need to respect the reasonable privacy interests of individuals whose information would be accessible through a registry. The Federation also notes that a registry must not, directly or indirectly, require legal professionals to report information protected by solicitor-client privilege or professional secrecy to government authorities. The Federation submission says it is “thus imperative that the registry regime be designed and implemented in a manner that respects the constitutional protections for solicitor-client privilege and professional secrecy recognized by the Supreme Court of Canada.” It is the Federation’s position that access to the registry must be provided both to competent authorities (e.g. law enforcement) and all persons with due diligence obligations under federal anti-money laundering and terrorist financing legislation or provincial/territorial law society rules. “Access to reliable beneficial ownership information is essential if the obligations on reporting entities under federal regulations, and those imposed on legal counsel by the law societies are to be meaningful and effective” the Federation submission states. “In the absence of access to reliable information in a central registry, legal counsel and others obliged to identify beneficial owners as part of due diligence requirements are left with no choice but to rely on information provided by their clients or the entities themselves with limited means of verifying the accuracy of the information.” The Consultation Paper issued by the Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development and Department of Finance states the primary goal of a central registry would be to ensure authorities have immediate access…

IMPORTANT NOTICE RE: COVID-19

The Federation of Law Societies of Canada is closely monitoring the rapidly evolving COVID-19 situation and taking steps to prioritize the health and safety of our staff, NCA candidates and that of the community-at-large. In compliance with government of Ontario orders, the offices of the Federation are now closed. While we are able to carry on most of our activities remotely, the COVID 19 pandemic has had an impact on the services provided by the National Committee on Accreditation. The May 2020 NCA examination session has been cancelled. With the need for social distancing, the uncertainties around travel and the variety of government orders in locations around the world, it is simply impossible to proceed with the session. Candidates who were registered to take exams in May will be automatically registered in subsequent exam sessions. The Federation understands this is a stressful time for all NCA candidates, and is committed to ensuring that timely information is provided. Information regarding upcoming exams and the ongoing processing of applications to the NCA is posted on the NCA Advisories page, and will be updated as appropriate. The results of the NCA exams completed in January 2020 were posted in the NCA Portal at the end of March. The NCA continues to process requests for Certificates of Qualification (CQs), although during these challenging times there may be delays in processing applications. For the time being, the NCA will be unable to produce paper Certificates, but candidates qualifying for a Certificate will be notified, as will appropriate law societies. The NCA web site, online application form, and NCA Portal are available at all times. NCA staff will answer any questions about our services and these changes. Please submit questions to the NCA regarding any of these changes by email to nca@flsc.ca.